Adieu'S Oral Promise And Cooperation With Enterprises In China Are Accused Of Delaying Tactics.

Adidas and Chinese foundry companies have the latest story of love and hatred.

In August 22nd, Adidas, who had been silent for a long time, finally issued a statement saying that it still had cooperative relations with China's more than 300 foundries and would continue to "fulfill its commitments to China".

Adidas said the termination of cooperation with the ten generation factories is to optimize the global procurement structure, not to Adidas in China.

Total production has an impact.

Adidas stressed that "China used to be and will continue to be an important purchasing market."

Since August

After the "no mercy" with the Chinese foundries, the future of the Chinese industry on ADI and OEM enterprises has become the focus of public attention.

Since Adidas's attitude has been unclear, the matter is more and more complicated.

For this reason, the reporter contacted one of the foundry enterprises which was terminated by cooperation, Shanghai Dong Long down products Co., Ltd., but the company hung up the phone on the grounds of "having guests".

Earlier, the head of the plant was preparing to negotiate with Adidas's verbal commitment "not to change cooperation before 2015," and demanded compensation for equipment losses.

In response, Yan Yiming, a well-known lawyer in Shanghai, told reporters that it was more difficult to ask for advice.

"The contract between the general factory and the Brand Company will be signed and there is a time limit.

As long as the Adidas party has one month to three months notice according to the contract stipulation.

It is lawful to terminate the contract. "

"Adidas did make an oral promise, but this commitment can not replace the extension of individual contracts.

Generally speaking, large Brand Company will not be too early to inform the termination of contracts in order to ensure the quality of the goods before the contract expires.

And the commitment of Adidas is only a statement of principle. If there are no individual factories to renew their contracts, there is room for evaluation in similar work environment and employee rights.

Yan Yiming said, "but the position is still binding on both sides. Adidas still has the obligation to contract first.

For this purpose, the factory has the right to claim compensation from Adidas.

Although Adidas said it will continue to cooperate with more than 300 Chinese enterprises, it is still a mystery to many OEM enterprises that this argument is reliable, because the fact that the first 10 subcontracting enterprises were weaned is an indisputable fact.